skip to content
healthlaw.org
Advanced Search

GAO Study of Abstinence Education Programs

Friday, November 17

  • Organization: National Health Law Program

The Government Accountability Office has released a report on Abstinence
Education:  Efforts to Assess the Accuracy and Effectiveness of
Federally Funded Programs (Oct. 2006),
available at: 
http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-87

 

Why GAO Did This Study:

 

Reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases and unintended
pregnancies is one objective of the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS). HHS provides funding to states and organizations that provide
abstinence-until-marriage education as one approach to address this
objective.

 

GAO was asked to describe the oversight of federally funded abstinence-
until-marriage education programs. GAO is reporting on (1) efforts by HHS
and states to assess the scientific accuracy of materials used in these
programs and (2) efforts by HHS, states, and researchers to assess the
effectiveness of these programs. GAO reviewed documents and interviewed
HHS officials in the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and the
Office of Population Affairs (OPA) that award grants for these programs.


What GAO Found
:


Efforts by HHS and states to assess the scientific accuracy of materials
used in abstinence-until-marriage education programs have been limited.
This is because HHS’s Administration for Children and Families (ACF)—
which awards grants to two programs that account for the largest portion of
federal spending on abstinence-until-marriage education—does not review
its grantees’ education materials for scientific accuracy and does not
require grantees of either program to review their own materials for
scientific accuracy.   In contrast, the Office of Population Affairs (OPA)
does review the scientific accuracy of grantees’ proposed educational
materials. In addition, not all states that receive funding from ACF have
chosen to review their program materials for scientific accuracy. In
particular, 5 of the 10 states that GAO contacted conduct such reviews.
Officials from these states reported using a variety of approaches in their
reviews. While the extent to which federally funded abstinence-until-
marriage education materials are inaccurate is not known, in the course of
their reviews OPA and some states reported that they have found
inaccuracies in abstinence-until-marriage education materials. For
example, one state official described an instance in which abstinence-
until-marriage materials incorrectly suggested that HIV can pass through
condoms because the latex used in condoms is porous.

 

HHS, states, and researchers have made a variety of efforts to assess the
effectiveness of abstinence-until-marriage education programs; however, a
number of factors limit the conclusions that can be drawn about the
effectiveness of abstinence-until-marriage education programs. ACF and
OPA have required their grantees to report on various outcomes that the
agencies use to measure the effectiveness of grantees’ abstinence-until-
marriage education programs. In addition, 6 of the 10 states in GAO’s
review have worked with third-party evaluators to assess the effectiveness
of abstinence-until-marriage education programs in their states. Several
factors, however, limit the conclusions that can be drawn about the
effectiveness of abstinence-until-marriage education programs.

 

Most of the efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of abstinence-until-
marriage education programs included in GAO’s review have not met
certain minimum scientific criteria—such as random assignment of
participants and sufficient follow-up periods and sample sizes—that
experts have concluded are necessary in order for assessments of
program effectiveness to be scientifically valid, in part because such
designs can be expensive and time-consuming to carry out. In addition,
the results of efforts that meet the criteria of a scientifically valid
assessment have varied and two key studies funded by HHS that meet
these criteria have not yet been completed. When completed, these
HHS-funded studies may add substantively to the body of research on the
effectiveness of abstinence-until-marriage education programs.

 

What GAO Recommends:

 

To address concerns about the scientific accuracy of materials used in
abstinence-until-marriage education programs, GAO recommends that
the Secretary of HHS develop procedures to help assure the accuracy
of such materials used in programs administered by ACF. HHS agreed to
consider this recommendation. HHS also provided information on steps it
takes to assure accuracy, which GAO incorporated into the report, as
appropriate.

Login
powered by probono.net

Contribute to NHeLP